Wednesday, March 2, 2022
The Department of Public Expenditure and Reform published a new circular on 9 February 2022 (the “Circular”), indicating a more pragmatic approach to dealing with issues raised by the current professional indemnity insurance market. This was subsequently followed by the publication of a new Guidance Note 1.1.2 (the “Guidance Note”) that expands on the issues raised by the Circular.
What has happened in the PII market?
The renewal of professional indemnity insurance (“PII”) policies has become a significant issue for the construction industry. The withdrawal of many insurers from the PII market, combined with the aftermath of the Grenfell Tower disaster has resulted in many contractors and design team members (particularly fire safety consultants) experiencing significant increases in their premia or even a refusal to provide cover for “each and every claim”.
Why was the Circular published?
Whilst this issue is not new – the private sector construction market in Ireland has adapted to agree more commercially reasonable PII provisions in building contracts and design team appointments – the position has not changed in public works tenders, as contracting authorities are prevented from amending the insurance provisions of the Capital Works Management Framework which require cover on for “each and every claim”.
This has led to a range of scenarios:
What does the Circular and Guidance Note do?
The Circular and Guidance Note flag a number of changes made (and changes that will be made) to the Capital Works Management Framework to allow contractors and consultants to temporarily offer PII cover in the “aggregate” rather than for “each and every claim” – provided that if “each and every claim” cover becomes available at commercially reasonable rates during the term of the contract, the contractor/consultant will be required to maintain “each and every claim” cover. These changes can be broadly categorised in two ways:
It is also useful to note that the Guidance Note also provides “recommended” levels of PII cover for consultants and contractors, based on the value of the construction works undertaken. The Guidance Note indicates that contracting authorities can deviate from these levels where it is justified “by the particulars of the project” – and as such insurance advice should be obtained by contracting authorities in setting such levels – but we suggest that the levels of insurance required would be lower than we would typically expect in private sector projects of comparable value.
Finally, the Guidance Note notes that a contracting authority can take out single project PII cover if it determines that it cannot obtain a suitable level of PII cover from consultants/contractors. Whilst this has a number of benefits to the contracting authority (it cannot be cancelled, it covers all aspects of the design and construction of works and includes a ring-fenced “aggregate” limit), it is typically only available for larger (€100m+) projects and is expensive both in terms of premiums and excesses payable in the event of a claim.
Despite the fact this issue has existed for a number of years, these changes can only be welcomed by contracting authorities and tenderers alike and reduces the likelihood of insurance issues creating problems in procurement processes going forward. As contractors and design team members will normally rely upon one PII policy across their business (rarely taking out specific cover for a particular project), contracting authorities will need to monitor contractors/consultants with “aggregate” cover to ensure that the specified “aggregate” limit is not close to exhaustion within a particular year. Seeking updated information on this, particularly for larger construction projects, will therefore be important.
These gradual reforms to the CWMF in 2022 should be welcomed. The indexation and inflation amendments, these insurance amendments and the upcoming consultation to include a liability cap within the public works contracts and conditions of engagement go some way to addressing some common concerns with the suite of documents that have been voiced over recent years. Other amendments identified in the accompanying press release note some beneficial changes for contracting authorities where tenderers rely upon the resources of third parties and greater use of the eESPD during tender procedures.
 The tender documents for consultants have already been updated – with the tender document templates for works contractors to be updated “by the end of February”. These documents have not been published yet but we will update the article once they are published.